You are browsing the archive for Professional development.

Using a wiki for a simple text-based game

October 14, 2007 in Learning technology

Wikis are great for presenting factual information, and Mediawiki is widely used for this. The only problem I’ve found with managing my own wiki is having to deal with all the spam that an open wiki site attracts.

My current Mediawiki site is my second attempt: this time around, it’s not a collaborative wiki, since it’s really there for my own personal publishing needs. And there are plenty of other collaborative wikis around.

Recently I’ve been playing with ideas around how Mediawiki could be used to implement a simple adventure game. Partly because I enjoy playing with the software, but also because I’m always keen to find ways to include problem-based learning into my professional development activities. So I spent a few hours developing the Learning Design Challenge.

Using a wiki for a simple text-based game.

It’s primitive – my first thought was to include a graphical component but I’ve decided I rather like the text-only format. Something to do with the relative ‘imaginative openness’ of text for the reader: maybe that’s why graphical novels are only a small part of the fiction market.

I’ve abandoned the idea of including objects that individual users can pick up etc – this would require a major coding effort. And the whole point of this is it’s very low-tech and very easy to implement!

Bookmark and Share

Read-write learning in professional development

May 22, 2006 in Pedagogy

In an earlier post, I described the concept of read-write learning in which learners generate knowledge in their own words. Web 2.0 software such as blogs and wikis are ideal for such activities. Engaging learners in collaboratively developing resources provides an opportunity to make prior experience and knowledge explicit, and develop a shared understanding of key concepts. It also helps establish a relationship based on equality and learning from each other. Working in a professional development context often entails a more applied focus than a purely academic programme. The emphasis is on ‘changing practice’ rather than ‘imparting a body of knowledge’. So the potential for deeper and more contextualised learning enabled by read-write learning processes is highly appropriate.

In my experience in professional development in education, read-write learning processes using blogs and wikis can help lead to a shared body of knowledge which is broader, deeper and better contextualised to participants’ needs and interests than any individual ‘expert’ is able to provide.

Possible drawbacks include:

  • participants may contribute ‘faulty knowledge’
  • participants may be reluctant to contribute – ‘give me the answers’
  • the problematic role of the ‘expert’ – how and when does the facilitator intervene?

But I believe these should be seen as opportunities for further development rather than reasons to avoid collaborative authoring. Simple web-based tools such as wikis and glossaries can provide useful environments for building resources collaboratively.

Bookmark and Share